RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'I am not a cheat'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 'I am not a cheat'

    Published: Wednesday | January 8, 2014 2 Comments


    Olympian Sherone Simpson (second left) with her lawyer Danielle Chai at the start of the two-day hearing into her anti-doping violation before an independent disciplinary panel at the Jamaica Conference Centre, downtown Kingston, yesterday. Looking on is Asafa Powell (right background), Simpson's former MVP teammate, while at left is Paul Doyle, the agent for both athletes. - Ian Allen/Staff Photographer

    Leighton Levy, Gleaner Writer

    A defiant Sherone Simpson maintained that she was not a cheat during her three-and-a-half hour testimony yesterday at the start of the two-day hearing into her doping violation before an independent disciplinary panel at the Jamaica Conference Centre, downtown Kingston.


    During her long but still-to-be-completed testimony, Simpson declared that she did everything possible, including researching on the Internet for about 14 hours, to ensure that a new supplement that was introduced to her by physical trainer Chris Xuereb did not contain any banned substances.

    However, according to Lackston Robinson, the attorney representing the Jamaica Anti-Doping Commission, the 2008 100-metre silver medallist did not go far enough.

    'SIGNIFICANTLY NEGLIGENT'
    He is contending that Simpson was "significantly negligent" so she would not be able to rely on World Anti-Doping Agency) rules 10.4 or 10.5.2 for the mitigation of sanctions. He also contended that Simpson could not also rely on rule 10.5.3, which allows for mitigation of sanctions where it is established that substantial assistance was given to authorities investigating the case.

    Rule 10.4 speaks to the elimination or reduction of a period of ineligibility and depends on whether an athlete or another person can establish when and how a specified substance entered his or her body or came into their possession and that the substance was not intended to enhance the athlete's performance. Rule 10.5.2 says an athlete's sanction can be reduced if it can be established that the athlete bears no significant fault or negligence, while 10.5.3 allows for the athlete to get a reduced sanction if the athlete renders significant assistance in establishing or discovering anti-doping violations.

    Simpson is being represented by attorneys Kwame Brown and Danielle Chai, who are being instructed by the law firm Samuda & Johnson. She was among five Jamaican athletes who tested positive for banned substances during the National Championships held in June 2013 as Jamaica selected its team to the 14th IAAF World Athletic Championships in Moscow in August.

    Under direct examination from Brown, Simpson said Xuereb arrived in Jamaica from Canada on June 6, 2013 with supplements for her. Among them were Combat Protein, Endura, Fish Oil, Cue 10, Epiphany D1 and vitamin D. She said she was familiar with most of them except for Epiphany D1, a supplement that claims to support short and long-term memory, increased attention span, boosts confidence and improves concentration and focus.

    It was revealed in pre-hearing discussions that samples of the supplement were sent by her attorneys to a lab for testing. One batch of Epiphany D1 tested was found to contain Oxilofrine, while the other did not.

    Simpson said she went to Google and typed in 'WADA prohibited list 2013'.
    "I looked at all the substances on the list," she said. She then checked the ingredients on the Epiphany label for unfamiliar compounds. She saw nothing on the bottle that appeared on the WADA 2013 list.

    She told Brown that she Googled all substances she was unfamiliar with. "There was nothing that rang any alarm bells."

    Under cross-examination, things became a bit testy between the Olympian and Robinson, who tried to establish that Simpson was negligent. He asked if as an elite athlete she was aware that manufacturers do not always include all the ingredients on the labels of supplements. She said she was not aware. Pressing further, he asked Simpson if she was aware that supplements could be contaminated.

    "I would not know that they may be contaminated," she responded.

    "Do you agree that a doctor or a nutritionist would be better able to say what is contained with a supplement?" Robinson asked. However, the 2006 Commonwealth 200 metres champion maintained that she had never needed to take the WADA list to a doctor or nutritionist for them to help determine if they were clean.

    She is expected to resume testifying today. Simpson's former MVP teammate Asafa Powell and her agent Paul Doyle are both expected to testify today.
    Last edited by Karl; January 8, 2014, 08:38 PM.
    Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015

  • #2
    ‘No alarm bells’

    Simpson relying on mitigating circumstances at hearing

    BY HOWARD WALKER Observer senior reporter walkerh@jamaicaobserver.com
    Wednesday, January 08, 2014 3 Comments








    Sherone Simpson arriving at Conference Room 4 for her anti-doping case at the Jamaica Conference Centre yesterday. (PHOTO: MICHAEL GORDON)

    .remove_caption{ display:none; }

    ATHENS Olympics 4X100m relay gold medallist Sherone Simpson is relying on mitigating circumstances, even as she identified an Epiphany D1 supplement as the cause for her positive drug test during the opening day of a scheduled two-day hearing before a Jamaica Anti-Doping Commission (JADCO) disciplinary panel at the Jamaica Conference Centre yesterday.

    While the 2006 Commonwealth Games 200m champion said she didn’t knowingly take the banned substance, as she researched the unknown supplement thoroughly, Lackston Robinson, JADCO’s attorney, argued that she was “significantly negligent” and could not rely on mitigating circumstances in her defence.

    The supplement Epiphany D1 was identified as the product that triggered her adverse analytical finding last June at the National Championships, despite what she claimed was thorough research on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) banned list.

    According to Simpson, she was given a number of supplements by Canadian physical trainer Chris Xuereb and being familiar with most except Epiphany D1, she went online for nearly three hours before taking it.

    “I Googled the Epiphany D1 on the WADA banned list and saw nothing on the bottle which appeared on the WADA list. No alarm bell. No red flag,” said Simpson. “I double-checked with a banned substance and typed it in and it brought me back to the banned list,” she explained.

    But Robinson was not satisfied that Simpson was sufficiently responsible and asked her to take him through the procedure which led to the consumption of the supplements.

    “Is it that what you do is sufficient? Robinson asked repeatedly as Simpson stuck to her answer. “I did all I could,” she said in a raised tone. “I see that as a refusal to answer the question,” said Robinson.

    “We will contend that the respondent was significantly negligent, therefore she cannot satisfy the requirements of articles 10.4 and 10.5.2. Therefore she cannot rely on the provisions of article 10.4 and 10.5.2 in the mitigation of sanctions.”

    Simpson, who returned a positive analytical finding for a stimulant, oxilofrine, last June, along with then training partner Asafa Powell, revealed that she had actually parted company with Xuereb at some stage prior to the National Championships.

    “For the simple reason he was getting too friendly,” Simpson explained while under cross-examination. “I had trusted Chris.

    He was helpful with my hamstring injury. My circle is small and I got to trust him and accepted him... I was comfortable with him,” she noted.

    According to Simpson, she saw Xuereb, while she was training at the Stadium East field, attending to Asafa Powell on May 13, then officially met him three days later and he started assisting with her injury.

    Having been consuming supplements since 2003, she was unfamiliar with Epiphany D1 and did her research which caused no alarm. But Robinson was relentless in trying to punch holes into Simpson's testimony.

    He even suggested that on several occasions her testimony differed from her initial statements.

    He also questioned why she failed to identify that supplement on the doping control form prior to her drugs test.

    The athlete replied that it was relatively new to her and she didn't remember it at the time. Robinson also suggested that she could have taken the substance to a doctor and have consultation with JADCO or members of the JAAA before taking the product.

    During cross-examination, Simpson revealed she had never attended a drug seminar for one reason or another, because she was either away of competing.

    “Are you aware that supplements may be contaminated by prohibited substances. If they are, would you agree with me that you would not find that on the ingredient list?,” asked Robinson. Simpson agreed, with some hesitation, then Robinson threw his next piercing question.

    “So you are willing to take the risk?” “I did all I could to check the supplement,” was Simpson is recurring answer. “You are determined to stonewall,” Robinson rebutted.

    “I am not a cheat, when I got the call that I got a positive test I said that it may have been from something that Chris had given me. I cried because I did so many tests before and none came back positive,” said Simpson, as her voice cracked up.

    The hearing was halted at 3:45 pm and will resume today at 10:00 am with Simpson still under cross-examination by Robinson.

    It appears that the two-day trial could be extended, as the JADCO three-member disciplinary panel, comprising chairman Lennox Gayle, Dr Jephthah Ford, and former FIFA referee Peter Prendergast, awaits a report from a lab in Kentucky, USA, which the defence claims proved that the Epiphany D1 supplement contains the banned substance oxilofrine.

    Former MVP teammate Asafa Powell, and agent Paul Doyle are expected to take the stand today as witnesses for Simpson.
    Last edited by Karl; January 8, 2014, 05:56 PM.
    Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015

    Comment


    • #3
      kwame gordon ..... how hard is it to get the man name right?

      Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

      Comment


      • #4
        The attorney representing the prosecution has

        suggested that the athlete should have had the compound/product which which contained the prohibited/"banned" substance analyzed by competent professionals.

        If it is assumed that the athlete is always ignorant on whether or not any product has prohibited ingredient or ingredients included - during manufacturing process or later/after - then would it not be also reasonable to assume the athlete must 'trust' no one and no substance? ...and that if taken one step further, the athlete must have all substances, products, foods, medications, etc. tested by 'competent person(s)' before use? If so, is that a practical position for the oversight authorities to take? ...and would any athlete outside of the *'big money earners' be able to afford the costs that would be incurred?

        Aside: Would this lead to eventual elimination of "big money earners"?
        ...as all were "puny financial earners" before they became "big money earners" and at the "puny money earner" stage the comprehensive testing of all 'put in the body' cannot be afforded?

        ...or is it tek yuh chances an iffen yuh nuh lucki yuh get wah di duck get...as it appears Sherrone is about to......

        Somehow after all the years I have found the anti-'drugging crusade' 'silly'...to me it still appears so
        "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

        Comment


        • #5
          no karl ... not a risk worth taking IMHO.

          if it comes back positive, that is a serious nail in her coffin.

          Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Gamma View Post
            no karl ... not a risk worth taking IMHO.

            if it comes back positive, that is a serious nail in her coffin.
            The 2nd sentence divorced from the first - As di ting set...I am in complete agreement.

            ...but I am pointing out that it is not a risk but the only path for those 'entry level athletes' as they cannot afford the costs associated with ensuring no chance of running afoul of - put another way: ensure no earthly way - having 'prohibited substances' used on (absorbed through skin), administered or anyway ingested.

            Just impossible to physically have all substances about to be used/ingested tested...or mentally keep trusted family members and others at arms length...or concerning finances, a young 'newbie' e.g. high school second former or prep and primary school kids having access to facilities testing every single occasion before ingesting. That testing...testing...and testing! Impossible! Just impossible to eliminate possibility of inadvertent 'doping'!
            ...
            "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

            Comment


            • #7
              She is ver fortunate that you are NOT her lawyer

              Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Gamma View Post
                She is ver fortunate that you are NOT her lawyer
                I am not defending her.
                I am pointing out the impossible position all athletes are in!

                If I had to defender her different story! Would just have to take her (the) slender shot and 'run wid hit' with/to a hot-shot attorney.
                "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just what is (JADCO) the "prosecuting" lawyer trying to achieve?

                  Where is JADCO's responsibility in all of this? Do they have any?
                  Peter R

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    JADCO's role is to prosecute ..... doing the bid of their master(s)

                    Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X