I’ve seen the statement, “No major global track meet next year” embedded in one or two track and field comments online. However, this thinking is a fallacy, and I chalk it up to genuine forgetfulness on the part of those posters.
“So, what’s the big deal, Historian,” you’re probably asking yourself.
Well, the facts will show the following:
2013: IAAF World Championships (Moscow, Russia)
2014: IAAF World Relays (Nassau, Bahamas)
2015: IAAF World Relays (Nassau, Bahamas)
2015: IAAF World Championships (Beijing, China)
And, just in case you’re thinking of a suitable rebuttal, the IAAF World Relays will obviously, by its very nature, include EVERY outstanding sprinter and middle distance runner.
The IAAF World Relays next year and in 2015 will be as follows:
4x100-meter relay
4x200-meter relay
4x400-meter relay
4x800-meter relay
4x1500-meter relay
Does any serious country dare leave their best sprinters at home? With this in mind, the only athletes who will get a break next year are the field events athletes (that is, the jumpers and throwers).
“So, what’s the big deal, Historian,” you’re probably asking yourself.
Well, the facts will show the following:
2013: IAAF World Championships (Moscow, Russia)
2014: IAAF World Relays (Nassau, Bahamas)
2015: IAAF World Relays (Nassau, Bahamas)
2015: IAAF World Championships (Beijing, China)
And, just in case you’re thinking of a suitable rebuttal, the IAAF World Relays will obviously, by its very nature, include EVERY outstanding sprinter and middle distance runner.
The IAAF World Relays next year and in 2015 will be as follows:
4x100-meter relay
4x200-meter relay
4x400-meter relay
4x800-meter relay
4x1500-meter relay
Does any serious country dare leave their best sprinters at home? With this in mind, the only athletes who will get a break next year are the field events athletes (that is, the jumpers and throwers).
Comment