RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armstrong plots strategy after loss of titles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armstrong plots strategy after loss of titles

    I am going to be watching these developments closely as it could have long term implications in sports other than cycling.

    As much as I believe that Lance Armstrong was using PEDs of some kind I am not sure that the USADA and WADA handled this case well. It has the feel of a prosecutor who knows the suspect is guilty but can't prove it legally and then starts abusing the system to get a conviction.

    Nike has made a decision to stick with Armstrong for now. That must be some kind of first for an athlete who has been stripped of his titles for doping.


    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Armstrong plots strategy after loss of titles
    25 August 2012, 07:41

    Cyclist Lance Armstrong plotted his career strategy on Saturday after the US anti-doping agency banned him from the sport for life and stripped him of the record seven Tour de France titles.

    USADA branded Armstrong a dope cheat Friday, a day after the 40-year-old Texan said he would not pursue a bid to clear himself of charges that he used performance enhancing drugs to win cycling's most prestigious race from 1999 to 2005.

    The agency laid out five rule violations for which Armstrong has been sanctioned, saying the cancer survivor who became a hero to millions took part in a systematic doping conspiracy with his then US Postal Service team.

    It said that, as Armstrong has dropped out of an arbitration process, he "has received a lifetime period of ineligibility and disqualification of all competitive results from August 1, 1998 through the present".

    Along with his celebrated haul of Tour titles, Armstrong stands to lose the Olympic bronze medal he won in 2000 along with other race titles, prize money and other awards.

    The International Cycling Union, the sport's governing body based in Aigle, Switzerland, had been fighting USADA for jurisdiction over Armstrong's case and said Friday it wanted to see USADA's full explanation for the sanctions before acting.

    However, USADA's statement made it clear they believe the UCI is bound by the World Anti-Doping Code to back up its findings.

    "Because Mr. Armstrong could have had a hearing before neutral arbitrators to contest USADA's evidence and sanction and he voluntarily chose not to do so, USADA's sanction is final," the agency's statement said.

    Armstrong had long denied accusations of doping but said on Thursday he would no longer even address the issue.

    "Today I turn the page," he said. But hours after USADA's announcement on Friday he made it clear that doesn't mean he'll disappear, tweeting his intention to compete in a local mountain bike race in the Aspen area in Colorado called the Power of Four.

    "Excited to be racing the #poweroffour tomorrow here in @AspenCO," Armstrong tweeted, apparently confident of a warm welcome from the local cycling community.

    Armstrong is also planning to run in a marathon on Sunday. His spokesman Mark Higgins said neither event comes under USADA's jurisdiction.

    SUPPORT FROM PUBLIC, SPONSORS

    Certainly Armstrong had already received support from leaders of the anti-smoking and anti-cancer causes that he champions, and from sports apparel giant Nike.

    "Lance has stated his innocence and has been unwavering on this position. Nike plans to continue to support Lance and the Lance Armstrong Foundation, a foundation that Lance created to serve cancer survivors," the firm said.

    Armstrong, who has branded the USADA probe a "witch hunt, had gone to court in a bid to block the agency's proceedings.

    But on Monday a federal judge in his hometown of Austin dismissed his lawsuit, leaving Armstrong until midnight on Thursday to tell USADA whether or not he would seek arbitration.

    "I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999," Armstrong said Thursday.

    "The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense."

    USADA maintains that Armstrong used banned substances – including the blood-booster EPO, steroids and blood transfusions – dating back to 1996, and said 10 of his former teammates were ready to testify against him.

    UCI HEADACHE

    If the UCI confirms the move, it faces a potential headache of choosing new winners for the seven disputed tours, as a number of cyclists who finished behind the American have also been implicated in doping scandals.

    Indeed, Armstrong has argued that at least some of the witnesses who have implicated him cannot be trusted as they are themselves admitted dope cheats.

    Former teammate Floyd Landis, who finally admitted doping years after he was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title, accused Armstrong of systematic doping, helping trigger a federal government probe of Armstrong and others.

    That investigation ended in February with no criminal charges brought, but it apparently provided further impetus to USADA's probe of the cyclist.

    USADA said it also had blood tests taken from 2009-2010, when Armstrong briefly came out of retirement to compete internationally again, that were "fully consistent" with blood doping.

    Armstrong, who retired from cycling last year, said he passed hundreds of drug tests during his career and adhered to the rules in place at the time of his Tour de France wins.

    "I refuse to participate in a process that is so one-sided and unfair," he said, alleging that from the start the probe had been "about punishing me at all costs."

    However, World Anti-Doping Agency chief John Fahey said Armstrong's decision not to fight the charges could only be seen as an admission of guilt.

    "There can be no other interpretation," he said.
    "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

  • #2
    Fromm what I heard, the evidence was overwhelming. Lance had no other choice, as they keept old blood and now can find everything that was in it due to the newfangled analytical tools.

    My concern is that they will have to go to finisher number 8 to give the title to, as 1 thru 7 already found guilty of something.

    The other point is that if doping was so widespread, Lance would HAVE to be the best to win 7 back to back titles, since the playing field was essentially level and he was thrashing fellow dopers.

    Comment


    • #3
      The other point is that if doping was so widespread, Lance would HAVE to be the best to win 7 back to back titles
      I agree. It is also why you have to believe he was doping, how could he not be and still beat them 7 times straight?

      This is why I find this case so interesting. He will still be seen as the 7 time champ, he will keep his main sponsors, and he will continue to say he did not dope, though most people already believe he probably did. And he is retired anyway.

      I am just not sure that USADA has won much of a victory here.

      Lets see how it plays out though. I wonder if they can release all the evidence they have on him anyway?
      "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

      Comment


      • #4
        What I am trying to understand is why go so hard after Armstrong, when they have conclusive stuff on Carl Lewis. What is really driving te Armstrong push, my understanding is that the Usada is anti doping agency for all us Olympic athletes so I am not sure I understand how the professional cycling angle is the main target. Then stripping titles that they did not issue, that is what makes no sense.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re Lewis, I am guessing maybe they don't have the blood samples like they do with Armstrong.

          Even so, it does appear that someone does not like him . Maybe it is for good reason, who knows. But even their argument as to why the statute of limitations does not apply in this case sounds a bit sketchy to me.
          "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

          Comment


          • #6
            The Swiss based International Cycling Union got a lot of money from Lance to foster anti-doping control research and application and so side with Lance and USADA bex bout dat.

            Comment


            • #7
              The USADA is so much out of step with this. How can we find someone guilty of doping (1) based on the word of others when he passed every drug test he was given. Sooner or later someone could come forward and say they saw Bolt taking drugs although he passed every test; and (2) how can they ban him for something 13 years ago when their own rule is that you can't go back over 7 years. Lance is still the greatest cyclist ever and those who cycle knows what it takes. The UCI needs to ignore the USADA
              ............................

              Comment


              • #8
                first they strip him of his seven titles and then he passes away ... damn shame! oh wait...that was NEIL armstrong! mah bad!

                Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                Comment

                Working...
                X