Some have argued that Bolt, had he an endorsement contract with Nike, or any other American corp, would be a much wealthier men today, and quite frankly, that might well be true. To counter that aguement, I would ask, "Would he have been able to criticize, in a frank, and honset manner, the utterances of the shameless hate mongering, Carl Lewis?". The answer to that would be a clear "NO", unless he wanted to commit economic suicide.
American-endorsed athletes, especially black athletes, have become slaves to corporations which endorse them, to the point where they remain mostly hapless observers in the face of all manner of attacks, verbally, and physically, sometimes by police officers and neighbourhood volunteer watchmen, against their own people.
In my opinion, Bolt's ability to be frank, and honest about Carl-Lewis-the-hater, is refreshing, and may well be a result of the absence of the ususal encumberance that our American brothers and sisters face when they are endorsed by the American enslavers, including Nike. Maybe not being endorsed by them is be a blessing in disguise.
Only one man's opinion.
American-endorsed athletes, especially black athletes, have become slaves to corporations which endorse them, to the point where they remain mostly hapless observers in the face of all manner of attacks, verbally, and physically, sometimes by police officers and neighbourhood volunteer watchmen, against their own people.
In my opinion, Bolt's ability to be frank, and honest about Carl-Lewis-the-hater, is refreshing, and may well be a result of the absence of the ususal encumberance that our American brothers and sisters face when they are endorsed by the American enslavers, including Nike. Maybe not being endorsed by them is be a blessing in disguise.
Only one man's opinion.
Comment