Reaction times measure when the athlete reacted. It says nothing about the start, i.e., how well the runner did the first 20 or 30 meters.
When yuh grasp that, then maybe, just maybe, we can go a little further.
I was only trying to help you since you are so desperate to showcase Williams with the Munro on his chest.
Let's say two youths ran 30m in 3.5 seconds and Youth 1 had a reaction time of 0.20 and Youth 2 had a reaction time of 0.30, which Youth litterally ran the 30m faster?
Let's say two youths ran 100m in 10.5 seconds and Youth 1 had a reaction time of 0.20 and Youth 2 had a reaction time of 0.30, which Youth litterally ran the 100m faster?
Look Mosiah, you need radar or mathermatical facts to prove your point.
The same type of thinking that created a problem cannot be used to solve the problem.
Baddaz, if you are saying he has "relatively good form" the implication COULD BE that he doesn't have much room for improvement... I'm just the interpreter here by the way... I don't know much about the technical side of t&f.
Comment