RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Smoking Gun

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Smoking Gun

    http://www.musclespeed.net/

    Please note:

    "Complies with WADA and NCAA lists of banned substances."


    Reason 9: It meets WADA's (World Anti-Doping Agency) prohibited list of banned substances which came into effect on January 1st 2008. This list is considered to be the authoritative reference for banned substances in international sport, and the list supersedes any Olympic anti-doping list previously established. It also complies with the list of banned drug-classes for 2007-08 as established by the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) Executive Committee.
    Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015

  • #2
    SAO PAULO (AP) — Five Brazilians preparing for this month's track and field world championships in Berlin have failed doping tests. Three of them competed at last summer's Olympics.

    Brazil's track and field federation Tuesday said the five are: Bruno Lins Tenorio de Barros, Jorge Celio da Rocha Sena, Josiane da Silva Tito, Luciana Franca and Lucimara Silvestre. Their "adverse results" were from out-of-competition tests by the federation on June 15.

    The athletes were already in Germany and have requested their B samples be tested. They are returning to Brazil to present their defense.
    SAO PAULO (AP) — Five Brazilians preparing for this month's track and field world championships in Berlin have failed doping tests. Three of them competed at last summer's Olympics.

    Brazil's track and field federation Tuesday said the five are: Bruno Lins Tenorio de Barros, Jorge Celio da Rocha Sena, Josiane da Silva Tito, Luciana Franca and Lucimara Silvestre. Their "adverse results" were from out-of-competition tests by the federation on June 15.

    The athletes were already in Germany and have requested their B samples be tested. They are returning to Brazil to present their defense.

    Barros helped Brazil finish fourth in the 400-meter relay in Beijing last year. Silvestre competed in the women's heptathlon and Tito was in the women's 1,600 relay.

    Barros helped Brazil finish fourth in the 400-meter relay in Beijing last year. Silvestre competed in the women's heptathlon and Tito was in the women's 1,600 relay.
    Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015

    Comment


    • #3
      Background on methylhexaneamine from Dutch article
      Wed Aug 5, 2009 04:37
      71.163.125.96


      We ask the List Committee to explain the backgrounds of the decisions to list certain stimulants under section S6a, and others under section S6b. While looking forward to such an explanation, we would like to ask WADA to move methylhexaneamine to the 'specified' part as we envisage problems regarding this substance if it remains to be listed as 'non specified'. It is increasingly marketed as a nutritional supplement and it is available as a supplement in several countries, including the Netherlands. It would be the first substance on the Prohibited List that can be legally sold in any store in our country. The risk of an athlete testing positive for this substance inadvertently is pretty high, even with the best educational programs. There is also a more pharmacological reason to ask for this change: since the effects of methylhexaneamine are comparable to ephedrine, pseuoephedrine, cathine, etcetera, it would be far more logical to list it in section b (specified stimulants). We ask the List Committee to list methylhexaneamine under section b, if it is indeed decided to list this particular stimulant.
      S8/S9


      Full article

      http://www.nieuwsbank.nl/inp/2009/07/31/V047.htm
      Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015

      Comment


      • #4
        Are we sure this is the drug and not this


        Methylanemine

        Methylexamine

        Methlexanemine

        Methlexemine

        Methylanmine

        Methyleamine


        Etc.etc Boss leave it alone ,I wont even bother asking the pharmacist about it .
        THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

        "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


        "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Jangle View Post
          Background on methylhexaneamine from Dutch article
          Wed Aug 5, 2009 04:37
          71.163.125.96


          We ask the List Committee to explain the backgrounds of the decisions to list certain stimulants under section S6a, and others under section S6b. While looking forward to such an explanation, we would like to ask WADA to move methylhexaneamine to the 'specified' part as we envisage problems regarding this substance if it remains to be listed as 'non specified'. It is increasingly marketed as a nutritional supplement and it is available as a supplement in several countries, including the Netherlands. It would be the first substance on the Prohibited List that can be legally sold in any store in our country. The risk of an athlete testing positive for this substance inadvertently is pretty high, even with the best educational programs. There is also a more pharmacological reason to ask for this change: since the effects of methylhexaneamine are comparable to ephedrine, pseuoephedrine, cathine, etcetera, it would be far more logical to list it in section b (specified stimulants). We ask the List Committee to list methylhexaneamine under section b, if it is indeed decided to list this particular stimulant.
          S8/S9


          Full article

          http://www.nieuwsbank.nl/inp/2009/07/31/V047.htm

          Is Dope testing now.. dope??
          TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

          Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

          D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

          Comment


          • #6
            Reason #9 has been changed

            Reason #9 has been changed.
            The same type of thinking that created a problem cannot be used to solve the problem.

            Comment

            Working...
            X