RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OOOH SARWAN or Exquisite Sarwan!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OOOH SARWAN or Exquisite Sarwan!

    Exquisite Sarwan!
    Right-hander's unbeaten 184 lifts Windies
    By Garfield Myers Editor-at-large South-Central Bureau
    Sunday, March 01, 2009
    Bridgetown, Barbados - Ramnaresh Sarwan was a delight to the eye in his flawless, unbeaten 184 yesterday as West Indies, replying to England's 600-6 declared, reached 398-5.
    Shamefully, his magnificent innings was overshadowed by horrendous officiating errors which threatened to undermine the West Indies' effort and made a mockery of the television referral system on which such high hopes have been pinned.
    Bridgetown, Barbados - West Indies' middle-order batsman Ramnaresh Sarwan executes a classic off-drive as England's wicketkeeper Tim Ambrose looks on during the third day of the fourth Test match at Kensington Oval yesterday. Sarwan was 184 not out. (Photo: AP)
    On a day when, television umpire Daryl Harper was asked to consider player-instigated referrals on four occasions, Shivnarine Chanderpaul (70) and Brendan Nash (33) were given out lbw even though tv replay technology clearly suggested they were hit too high.
    In the first instance, Hawkeye technology, which is not used under the current experimental referral system, later showed that the ball would have missed Chanderpaul's stumps by inches.
    In the second, Hawkeye suggested the ball would also have cleared the bails. Amazingly, umpire Aleem Dar of Pakistan reversed himself to give Nash out, after consultation with Harper.
    Inevitably, the situation caused boundless confusion. So much so, that the word at day's end was that coach John Dyson went to the match referee Alan Hurst to seek clarification on the use of the referral system.
    From a West Indies' perspective, it didn't help that at their untimely end, both Chanderpaul and Nash
    were batting well and building strong partnerships with Sarwan.
    Looking on from the other end, Sarwan held his composure to continue his magnificent form of the previous Test matches.
    The 28 year-old Guyanese rarely put a foot wrong as he continued from his overnight 40, to record his 14th Test century and his third in four innings this series. This gem in Bridgetown follows 107 in Kingston, and 94 and 106 in Antigua for an overall aggregate of 491.
    Always a joy to watch, Sarwan was especially so yesterday on a pitch which facilitated strokeplay - with the ball coming nicely on to the bat at consistent bounce and pace. The right-hander's cover drives goose-pimpled the flesh but his cuts, on-drives and wristy flicks were also nothing short of exquisite.
    At day's end, Sarwan who has so far batted in excess of six and a half hours had faced 280 balls and cracked 19 fours and two sixes.
    He shared partnerships of 108 for the second wicket with Devon Smith (55), 122 for the fourth with Chanderpaul and 53 for the fifth with Nash. At the close another good stand so far worth 64 was building with Denesh Ramdin, not out 25.
    At the close, Sarwan emphasised the value of "partnerships" if the West Indies are to complete the task of saving the Test match. "We have to continue (today) for as long as possible," he said.

    From the overnight 85-1, the West Indies added another 78 in the pre-lunch session for the loss of Smith and Ryan Hinds (15).
    The smooth, silky Sarwan and a less certain Smith had batted for an hour when the latter was adjudged lbw in the first over from the impressive offspinner Graeme Swann (3-92).
    Smith's referral was to no avail, but Hawkeye would later suggest the ball would only have clipped the outside of offstump. The left-handed opener had faced 103 balls and hit five fours.
    Ryan Hinds (15) never settled against Swann and it came as no surprise when he was trapped in front by Swann. It was the only lbw dismissal of the day that drew no complaints.
    Chanderpaul's flowing cover-driven boundary to his first ball indicated form and confidence. And he would continue in similar style with the superb Sarwan until the sixth over after tea - the 85th of the innings and the fifth with the second new ball - when the officials intervened with deadly effect.
    Hit high on the front pad by a delivery from Anderson that straightened off the pitch, Chanderpaul, who had played no shot, looked up to see umpire Russell Tiffin's finger in the air. After initially spreading his arms in surprise and consternation, Chanderpaul collected himself to request the referral.
    TV replays appeared to confirm the initial impression from the boundary's edge that he had been hit too high. Not so, said the umpires and Tiffin's finger went up for a second time. Chanderpaul's delightful knock had lasted 134 balls,and contained 11 fours.
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

  • #2
    Rhatid. Ramdin make a big score. Carlton Baugh not getting another chance for a year.

    Comment


    • #3
      the mighty mighty west indies...

      its about time ramdin made a big score... with this wicket, if he had failed he would prove to be more of a rucks wid de bat...

      mi affi congratulate him pon de innings... him play some classic strokes... not a hindsight 20/20 comment, but coming into this match him was looking better wid de bat... mi feel good fi him... yes, baugh nuh look like him stand a chance now, unless ramdim gets injured...

      affi big up sarwan... a colossal big up tuh... dat iz a man in form...

      west indies should just bat on... lets see if taylor can mek some runs tuh.. him looking good and comfortable aready... dat six off sidebottom was a classic... dat was a shot from a 'batsman'... he will develop into an allrounder... he reminds me of malcolm marshall...
      'to get what we've never had, we MUST do what we've never done'

      Comment


      • #4
        Once again I am happy with the team. They are competing.

        The were sloppy in the field but they didn't respond with their usual batting collapse.

        Powell should be changed and they should drop Hinds and bring in Dwayne Bravo or if he is not ready yet Simmons.

        Comment


        • #5
          140+ lead with a day to go. This is where a real strike bowler or better yet, a pair of them, could make a big difference.

          Back in the day Ambrose and Walsh would salivate at the opportunity to steal a win in a situation like this.
          "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

          Comment


          • #6
            whey bricktop deh? windies may not yet have the best bowling attack in the world...but if they suck then SURELY SURELY england bowlers must swallow!!!

            3 o 4 tiefin outs...gayle, chanders and nash and STILL dem mek over 700?? when one considers englands 600 was on the bak of some drops.....

            Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Gamma View Post
              whey bricktop deh? windies may not yet have the best bowling attack in the world...but if they suck then SURELY SURELY england bowlers must swallow!!!

              3 o 4 tiefin outs...gayle, chanders and nash and STILL dem mek over 700?? when one considers englands 600 was on the bak of some drops.....
              See mi here. Our bowlers are no good. England's bowlers are no good. What has changed?

              Comment


              • #8
                Tempers flare in the English Barracks as W.I up the pressure

                England tempers fray as West Indies prosper

                Kensington Oval (fourth day of five): England, with all second-innings wickets in hand, are 143 runs behind West Indies


                (Julian Herbert/Getty Images)



                Too little, too late: Ramnaresh Sarwan is bowled, finally, for a magnificent 291







                Mike Atherton, Chief Cricket Correspondent, Bridgetown, Barbados

                DIV#related-article-links P A { COLOR: #06c}DIV#related-article-links P A:visited { COLOR: #06c}#FlashContent2 { VISIBILITY: hidden}After controversial Saturday came soporific Sunday. Ramnaresh Sarwan flowed on and on, much like the mighty Essequibo River besides which he was born; Denesh Ramdin went to his maiden Test match hundred and beyond to his highest first-class score, and England’s attack became utterly drought-stricken. Only four wickets fell during the day, all of them in the last session. Toil, toil and more toil; a day in church would have been more fun.
                By the evening session, as West Indies went past 700, their highest score at Kensington Oval, English tempers flared. Ramdin went to his 150 with three fours in an over off Graeme Swann, the second of which landed over Ryan Sidebottom’s head at deep mid-wicket.
                Sidebottom’s misjudgment elicited a torrent of abuse from Swann, and from Andrew Strauss, the captain, and it just about summed up England’s day.
                The declaration came when West Indies’ lead had reached 149 and England’s chances of winning the series had disappeared. Strauss and Alastair Cook had the unappealing prospect of facing two overs at the end of the day, during which Fidel Edwards again served up some extreme pace, an appetiser for what is to come on the last day. England should still go to Trinidad with a chance of levelling the series, though, because the pitch is so true that it would take a batting horror of Adelaide proportions, and more, for them to lose this game.
                Related Links




                The excellence of the pitch should take nothing away from Sarwan, who is in the purplest of patches. He came into this series with a question mark against him — not against his talent, but the application of it after a poor, first-class return on the tour to New Zealand. Now he has scored 107, 94, 106 and 291 in consecutive innings against England. They are sick of the sight of him.
                On and on he went, for 699 minutes in all, passing 200 with a slashing cut off James Anderson over the slips; passing 250 with controlled pull for two off Paul Collingwood, and beyond his previous Test best of 261 not out against Bangladesh with a push drive off Owais Shah — each milestone celebrated in restrained style, not through tiredness, but because each was a mere signpost on the road to a more meaningful destination.
                That destination was a triple hundred — the most select of landmarks in Test cricket — and he was nine runs away when he played a loose drive to Sidebottom, who had the third new ball in his hand, and was bowled off an inside edge. His innings was the fourth-highest score against England by a West Indies player and the sixth highest by a West Indian in Tests overall. Fittingly, perhaps, he did not pass another iconic innings, that of Vivian Richards, who also made 291 against England in the hot summer of 1976.
                Sarwan is in the kind of form that Richards knew about that parched day at the Oval in London, one that visits upon sportsmen only rarely.
                Call it “the zone”, call it what you will, but there is an utter assurance about his play, the prospect of a big score not so much a possibility as an inevitability. Batsmen, too often, are at the mercy of events — the wicked ball, the bad bounce, the umpiring blunder — but occasionally sublime form overrides capricious fortune.
                He was helped somewhat by England’s tactics. In his first 200 runs, there was one leg-side boundary: the rest, all 22 of them, came through the off side, an indication that England had bowled to his strengths for long periods. For the most part, England’s line should be straight to him, their length full.
                Sarwan is a beautiful player through the off side and England seemed happy to encourage the sight of him cutting and driving them to distraction. His technique is such that, by keeping his back foot on leg stump and moving his front foot across his crease, he positions himself to hit through cover, point and backward of point. He thrives on width, being as brutal on the cut as anyone.
                He had taken his team to within five runs of England’s first-innings total when he was dismissed, but he could not have done so without finding an able partner in Ramdin, who sailed past his hundred just after England had suffered the indignity of having to take a third new ball. A leg glance brought it up and wild celebrations followed — a jump for joy, an acknowledgement to his father, Diaram, who was watching in the 3Ws Stand and then a pause as he brought out a note from his pocket — thanking David Williams, the assistant coach, Ian Bishop, the former West Indies fast bowler and Sarwan for their help.
                England’s attack lacked cutting edge, with Sidebottom the biggest concern. Seemingly short of full fitness and certainly short of optimum pace, he has looked ineffective when the ball has stopped swinging and the suspicion remains that his outstanding year in 2007-08, when he took more than half his present tally of wickets against New Zealand, was a spike of excellence on a more ordinary chart.
                Not that Anderson or Stuart Broad were any more effective, although their eagerness was never in doubt. England’s seamers bowled 104 overs between them for four wickets. They need to find a leader of the pack who can transcend conditions, as Edwards did for West Indies during the first two days of this game, and as he will look to do on the last.
                England: First Innings 600-6 dec (A J Strauss 142, R S Bopara 104, P D Collingwood 96, A N Cook 94, T R Ambrose 76 not out).
                West Indies: First Innings
                D S Smith lbw b Swann 55
                *C H Gayle lbw b Anderson 6
                R R Sarwan b Sidebottom 291
                R O Hinds lbw b Swann 15
                S Chanderpaul lbw b Anderson 70
                B P Nash lbw b Swann 33
                †D Ramdin b Swnnn 166
                J E Taylor b Swann 53
                S J Benn c Ambrose b Anderson 14
                D B L Powell not out 13
                Extras (b 15, lb 11, w 1, nb 6) 33
                Total (9 wkts dec, 194.4 overs) 749
                Related Links




                F H Edwards did not bat.
                Fall of wickets: 1-13, 2-121, 3-159, 4-281, 5-334, 6-595, 7-672, 8-701, 9-749.
                Bowling: Anderson 37-9-125-3; Sidebottom 35-4-146-1; Broad 32-4-113-0; Swann 50.4-8-165-5; Pietersen 9-1-38-0; Bopara 13-0-66-0; Collingwood 16-1-51-0; Shah 2-0-19-0.
                England: Second Innings
                *A J Strauss not out 5
                A N Cook not out 0
                Extras (nb 1) 1
                Total (no wkt, 2 overs) 6
                Bowling: Edwards 1-0-2-0; Powell 1-0-4-0.
                Umpires: Aleem Dar (Pakistan) and R B Tiffin (Zimbabwe).
                Television umpire: D J Harper (Australia).
                Match referee: A G Hurst (Australia).
                Reserve umpire: C R Duncan.
                Series details: First Test: West Indies won by an innings and 23 runs (Kingston, Jamaica). Second Test: Match drawn (North Sound, Antigua). Third Test: Match drawn (St John’s, Antigua). Fifth Test: March 6-10 (Port of Spain, Trinidad).
                THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

                "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


                "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

                Comment


                • #9
                  den ef england bowlers are no good mek yuh did a galang suh? a di fuss mi hear yuh mention dat.

                  anyway in this series so far..is one side bow out di odda fi 51, if memory serves me right......

                  Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Gamma View Post
                    den ef england bowlers are no good mek yuh did a galang suh? a di fuss mi hear yuh mention dat.

                    anyway in this series so far..is one side bow out di odda fi 51, if memory serves me right......
                    Galang how? My position was and is that our bowling attack is toothless. Nothing that has transpired in the series thus far has served to change my mind.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Taylor's bowling in Kingston was a buck up?
                      Peter R

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Is a bowling attack made up of one man? Does one good spell define a bowling attack?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          nubbaddy nah try change yuh mind becasue a you name bricktop....5 catches or thereabouts went down...how is that the bowlers fault? yuh love reason backwards...draw yuh conclusion first an den.......

                          Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Five ??

                            You mean you lost count after 5...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Gamma View Post
                              5 catches or thereabouts went down...how is that the bowlers fault? yuh love reason backwards...draw yuh conclusion first an den.......
                              How many catches went down today?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X